A Decade of Silence: Ex-Army Soldier and Central Govt Employee Alleges Institutional Apathy Over Workplace Harassment, Severe Illness, and Missing Persons

VIDYA SAGAR-18/07/2026

NEW DELHI —

In a harrowing account that spans across multiple central ministries, state departments, and top constitutional watchdogs, a former Indian Army personnel and central government employee has come forward alleging systemic institutional stonewalling.

The individual, identifying as Mr. Raghu Nagaraj—formerly associated with the Films Division under the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting—has detailed a prolonged timeline of workplace harassment, a severe medical crisis, financial ruin, and the mysterious disappearance of a loved one and her family since 2022.

Despite escalating the matter to the Prime Minister’s Office, the Supreme Court of India, and the President’s Secretariat, the complainant claims to be trapped in a web of bureaucratic silence.

The Origin: Alleged Harassment at SRPC Bangalore (2014–2020)

According to documented internal correspondence, the grievance originates between 2014 and 2020 during the complainant’s tenure at the Southern Regional Power Committee (SRPC) office in Bangalore. Nagaraj alleges that severe professional and personal harassment took place during this window. Despite repeated representations to his primary head office at the Films Division, Government of India, he asserts that no formal internal inquiry or punitive actions were ever initiated to address the workplace hostility.

The Missing Family and Alleged Data Stonewalling

The crisis escalated exponentially in 2022 when the complainant’s partner and her entire family vanished from their official residence at Quarter No. 13/9, 2nd Floor, Indian Bureau of Mines (IBM) Department Staff Quarters, Nandini Layout, Bangalore (560096).

In a bid to locate them, Nagaraj approached multiple state and central agencies to access basic contact data, only to face total administrative non-cooperation:

• The Indian Bureau of Mines (IBM): Has reportedly withheld family records, emergency addresses, and updated contact numbers, despite formal file tracking under File No. F-23/1/2025-ESTT-IBM_HQ.

• Rajasthan RTO: Has allegedly refused to release critical vehicle registration data that could track the family’s transit or relocation.

• Kendriya Vidyalaya (MG Railway Colony School): Has declined to provide underlying student or family enrollment details associated with the household.

A Compounding Medical and Financial Emergency

Exacerbating the legal battle is a severe physical breakdown. Nagaraj is currently battling advanced spinal and neurological complications, including Cervical and Lumbar Spondylitis, Sciatica, and severe groin pain, leaving him completely unable to walk.

Compounded by acute financial distress, the combination of physical immobility and economic strain has severely limited his capacity to pursue physical legal representation, prompting a mass digital filing campaign.

A Mountain of Dossiers: Escalation to the Highest Authorities

Frustrated by local administrative deadlocks, the case has grown into a massive legal portfolio comprising 244 PDF complaint documents forwarded to the highest judicial and executive offices in India.

The active list of statutory and judicial filings includes:

Additionally, prominent Ex-Indian Army personnel Mr. Chandu Chavan (No. 15511337X) has been cited within the circle of awareness regarding these escalating complaints.

Legal Counsel and Medical Witness Appeal

As the legal gridlock continues, the complainant’s external support system is urging transparency from the departments involved. Advocate Anushka Mishra, practicing at the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Lucknow Bench), alongside the complainant’s long-term associate Dr. Vinod Raj R.K. (a professional Dental Surgeon and Tricho-Cosmetologist), are seeking immediate structural intervention to ensure the complainant’s grievance is formally heard under human rights protocols.

With Public Interest Litigations (PILs) logged sequentially at the Supreme Court of India as recently as July 2026, rights advocates argue that central departments must provide accountability. Whether this is an issue of bureaucratic oversight or a deliberate denial of information under the Right to Information boundaries remains to be seen.

The Ministries involved have not yet issued official public statements regarding the pending CPGRAMS grievances.